I said in a previous writing:
โYou may choose to help, but also extricate yourself from the relationship, because you realize most people cannot deeply love someone who fixes themโ
And @WetNWild-couple (on FetLife) said, โIโd be interested in hearing a little more on your thoughts on this topic. Why most people cannot deeply love someone who fixes them. I love your realness!โ
Sure. Here goes.
Iโve been saying it for years, if you really love someone and want to create a deep relationship with them, you cannot treat them like a project.
That does not foster love and intimacy.
It fosters one of two things:
1.Neediness and dependency.
2.Resentment.
Some times, often, actually, it creates a maelstrom of both.
And yet, strangely enough, the fixing-style relationship is the one we see most commonly modeled pretty much everywhere in our culture.
Itโs usually portrayed as humor:
โOh, that guy, when will he learn?โ As she proceeds to show him how to do it RIGHT.
โSilly woman, if she really knew how much I loved her, she would pick me,โ and so he works patiently for her to stop being an idiot and make the right choice.
And so on.
Itโs also how our friends talk about their partners. They โnegโ them in conversations with others, and note how theyโd love to change them or how theyโd be better off, if only theyโd do things the way WE want them to.
โThey are such a slob. I swear, I have to clean up after them a dozen times a day.โ
โYou know, they have to act so tough. They need to learn to cry.
โThey are so wild. I am taming them.โ
In fact, one of the biggest movie tropes out there is โTo get the girl, save her life.โ
Bleh.
Iโm not saying that fixing someone NEVER works. Iโm sure it does sometimes.
And Iโm sure that YOUR relationship is the exception to the rule, of course it is.
But hear me out, will you?
Just in case.
Look, the basis of deep intimacy and love is being accepted for who you are. Really accepted. Which means you have to be SEEN as that person, and you have to be allowed to fully express that person.
Regardless of how clueless/dorky/wrong that person may be sometimes.
Because no one is perfect, and most of us are terrified of not being good enough, and we love people who donโt only allow us to be ourselves, but love the parts of ourselves that we see as utterly imperfect.
โWhat about power exchange relationships, then?โ You might ask.
Well, thank you for bringing that up.
Because it does seem like we are often fixing people in those relationships doesnโt it?
Except weโre not.
Not really.
Weโre enabling each other to fix ourselves.
Get that? Iโll say it again, and with more clarity:
In power exchange relationships, we see each other and our flaws, acknowledge them, and then collaborate to create a relationship in which we BOTH grow and fix things we want to fix about ourselves.
Wait. โBut the dominant is totally the fixer. Thatโs why they are in charge.โ
No.
Not really. The dominant is not perfect, either. Thatโs a shitty trope as well, and does more harm than good.
Dominants learn and grow in relationships, too. As much as any submissive.
Power exchange is a collaboration between two people. One loves to take the lead. The other loves to give that lead to another.
And ideally, both want to work TOGETHER to overcome their (perceived and real) flaws to create a the best relationship possible.
However, if one walks into a relationship (usually the dominant, but not alwaysโand not just power exchange relationships) determined to MAKE the other person a better person, Iโm going to guarantee that 99.9% of the time, itโll end in hurt feelings, resentment and recriminations.
Because as flawed as we know we are, we donโt love people who fix us.
We love people who love us.